The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This article seems very essay-like, and focused on contradicting common historical interpretations rather than simply reporting the general trends and exceptions. I would almost propose a delete, but I'm not totally familiar with the scholarship on the topic. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I agree; it's more a piece of advocacy than an impartial article. I think deletion would be a good idea. Languagehat (talk) 21:01, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
This simply duplicates content from Kapisa (city). I'll merge and redirect it, unless someone has an objection. utcursch | talk 15:25, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
