Talk:Ethics in pharmaceutical sales

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Problems with the article edit

This article needs some serious attention.

  • It reads like an essay
  • Probably needs NPOV adjustment
  • Needs copyediting

POV edit

The intent of this article is to attack the drug industry. It has no encyclopedic value. Do we want this kind of content here?Intermittentgardener (talk) 20:13, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

request to add an external link edit

www.medical-brochures.blogspot.com is a gallery of pharmaceutical advertisements, with critique on some adverts from the ethical point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.83.159.216 (talk) 06:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ethics in pharmaceutical sales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply