Talk:Esophageal pH monitoring
Latest comment: 2 years ago by ThePedanticPrick in topic Is there a gold standard?
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Esophageal pH monitoring.
|
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
DID A PHYSICIAN WRITE THIS?
editIf medical articles aren't written and signed by qualified medical experts, they should be deleted. The wrong information could be extremely harmful. People that are not M.D.'s and PhD's in medicine have no business writing articles about something on which they have little real expert knowledge. Wiki pseudo experts don't cut it. 75.217.247.203 (talk) 22:34, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, so glad you're not in charge of Wikipedia policy, because I'd actually like a less technical explanation of this.. where do they stick the catheter? --72.211.147.156 (talk) 00:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Is there a gold standard?
editThe first paragraph says "Esophageal pH monitoring is the current gold standard for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).", but then the "Clinical application" section says "Although there remains no gold standard for the diagnosis of GERD,...". Seems like mixed messages. ThePedanticPrick (talk) 19:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC)