Talk:Erskine

Latest comment: 1 year ago by John Maynard Friedman in topic Human inhabitation of Erskine area

Comments

edit

im from erskine and ive never heard erskine hospital refered to as old erskine!

I moved to Erskine in 1973 and the hospital area was known as Old Erskine. Red buses used to have the detination of Erskine New Town referring to Bargarran.Tommyin OZ (talk) 03:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Erskine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Human inhabitation of Erskine area

edit

"Archaeological evidence states that agricultural activity took place within the area as far back as 3000 BC and it has been inhabited by humans since 1000 BC. How does that statement make any sense? Agricultural activity taking place 2000 years before human inhabitiation? The reference should be checked to see if the dates have not been inverted or something. Farefeerfalling (talk) 00:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Given that the statement is unsourced, it can't be checked. I have tagged it as needing a citation and as dubious. (It is not entirely incredible, if you read it the right way. There could be archaeological evidence of agriculture from 5000 years ago but no evidence of habitation earlier than 3000 years ago: that doesn't mean that it wasn't inhabited, only that no evidence has been found that it was.)
If a source is not produced within the next month or two, then the assertions should be deleted. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply