Talk:Epidemiology of bed bugs

Developing countries

I've never seen it in reliable sources or reliable medical sources, but plenty of anecdotal evidence contradicts the statement that bedbugs are not "a particular problem" in developing countries. Many, many travelers will vouch that this is not true at all of some (most?) developing countries that have thriving tourist industries. There were some mysterious deaths of tourists in Chiang Mai, Thailand a year or two ago that were blamed on overzealous use of pesticides due to a bedbug infestation.

Anyone with RS on bedbugs in developing countries, please contribute! AADM3 (talk) 15:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

BTW, the 'not a particular problem in the developing world' statement also contradicts this, from the summary: "Previous to this they were common in the developing world..." So, when there's some evidence, one way or the other, please also remove the contradiction. WikiAlto (talk) 05:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

I took the liberty of removing the "Developing countries", and renamed the "Developed World" to "Worldwide". The "Citation Needed" tag was added in 2015, and over the past 8 years no one ever bothered to expand and/or source it. --Hagnat (talk) 19:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Illogical statement about the effect of DDT

"The fall in bed bug populations after the 1930s in the developed world is believed to be partly due to the usage of DDT to kill cockroaches,[6] which are a natural predator of the bed bug."

If a natural predator of bed bugs was killed, then the population of bed bugs should have risen, not fallen. I don't know what the truth is about this, but I don't think that this sentence can be correct.

I'm not an expert on wikipedia but this article seems quite weak, in general. WikiAlto (talk) 06:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Epidemiology of bed bugs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111107010535/http://health.usnews.com:80/usnews/health/articles/070708/16bedbug.htm to http://health.usnews.com/usnews/health/articles/070708/16bedbug.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101105054628/http://www.epa.gov:80/pesticides/ppdc/bedbug-summit/ to http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/ppdc/bedbug-summit/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100625233657/http://urbanentomology.tamu.edu/bedbugs/bedbugs.cfm to http://urbanentomology.tamu.edu/bedbugs/bedbugs.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 25 December 2016 (UTC)