This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Qualcomm /Apple spat ("sigh - another one..") about ET patent violation (as of 2018)?edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I just saw this article (Apple to stop selling iPhone 7 and 8 in Germany as Qualcomm secures another sales ban (December 20, 2018)) that Qualcomm claims/claimed that Intel violated a patent they had on ET, and manged to get Apple to stop selling phones in Germany. I don't know the details, or if it's still ongoing - is Qualcomm claiming that Intel stole their own implementation details, or that they somehow have a patent on the *concept*? (I thought that was supposed to be impossible and only actual inventions/implementations could be patented. But then IP law is complicated and/or broken..) Is this notable/related enough to include here? Jimw338 (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
