Talk:Enclosed Alphanumerics

List

This article is clearly a list, and I have added the appropriate template.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:C0 controls and basic Latin which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 08:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:C0 Controls and Basic Latin - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 17:01, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Missing numbers

What about ❶ ❷ ❸ ❹ ❺ ❻ ❼ ❽ ❾ ❿? --FML ^{talk - me at pt} 21:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Those are in the Dingbats Unicode Block mentioned in the third sentence of the article. DRMcCreedy (talk) 14:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

What about ⓪ ⓿?--Arsenij N N (talk) 10:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

U+24EA ⓪ CIRCLED DIGIT ZERO and U+24FF ⓿ NEGATIVE CIRCLED DIGIT ZERO are both shown in the Enclosed Alphanumerics block chart in this article. DRMcCreedy (talk) 22:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Unicode block which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:19, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Put all the Unicode code points together

Would it make sense to put description of all enclosed characters in Unicode into this single article, and perhaps also merge the other block(s?) that consist only of such characters.Spitzak (talk) 19:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

I don't see a benefit in merging the Unicode block articles themselves but wouldn't oppose a "list of enclosed characters" article if you really wanted to create one. DRMcCreedy (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

I agree with DRMcCreedy. It is very useful to maintain separate articles corresponding to individual Unicode blocks, but I certainly have no objection to creating an article that provides an overview of enclosed Unicode characters, similar to what we have for e.g. Latin script in Unicode. BabelStone (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Why emoji?

Section Emoji describes the use of Ⓜ as an emoji. Any idea why that was decided that way? AFAIK, for © or ℗ there is no emoji. ◅ Sebastian 10:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)