Old discussion

edit

The product name is a typo on Wikipedia. It does not have the ' between the r and g. I verified this on the packaging as well as their website in official documentation at http://www.emergenc.com/. This should be changed so people can find the wiki page. 75.173.201.136 (talk) 16:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


Is this verified and/ or neutral: "regular use should be avoided, seeing as how it contains more than 1000% of your daily vitamin C value, 416% of your vitamin B12 daily value, and 500% of your Vitamin B6 value, based on a 2000 calorie diet."



In order to offer more information on this product, I offer two 2 copies of the same article:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2000_May_10/ai_62007836

http://www.vitamincfoundation.org/vitc_suit.html

I do not have the time to write a proper article on this. I could not find any follow up articles on the "intended lawsuit", seeing how the plaintiff has passed away. I will offer that the "Minimum Daily Requirement" is only a minimum. "Minimum Daily Requirement" is a Wiki article that needs to be written.

It is a unique formulation of Vitamin C. I personally swear by this product at the onset of a cold.

Sorry for just throwing this information here.

JTH01 (talk) 05:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bold this is nort enough informatiom —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.225.194.4 (talk) 08:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Reply

first I've heard of it

edit

This is the first I've heard of it. Wikipedia page for an obscure product capitalizing on misleading ideals with no scientific foundation. Good advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.173.208.251 (talk) 02:12, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emergen-C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emergen-C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Emergenc" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Emergenc. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 19:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Reply