Talk:Embers (album)

Can it be expanded?

Can this article be expanded? Only one section of prose (background) + a lead fits C-class criteria fine. But what about Critical Reception? Professional reviews are supposed to be moved to their own section now, along with expanded text. They should not appear in the infobox, this is an old and deprecated style. What about how the record was recorded, not just why it was recorded? Any special instruments used? Are any of the songs part of a performance repertoire? The album has several singles, these should be discussed a little at least. I didn't really learn anything substantial about the album from reading through the article, otherwise. In short, the coverage of the album isn't strong enough to warrant B-class. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 23:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback, I just wanted to check how I can improve the article. Critical reception is a bit hard with Nadia's work not being mainstream. I will try to add some more detail based on the reviews, of which the one from sputnik music I was told is not suitable since it's by a user and not staff. As far as recording is concerned, I definitely have no idea since that has never been covered in any of the reviews or interviews by Ali, in which the most she has stated is that she starts out generally working on her songs by working either on the lyrics or the melody on a piano and guitar. I have contacted her PR though to see if I can get more critical reviews of her work. Hassan514 (talk) 15:30, 22 May 2011 (UTC)