Talk:Elvy Kalep/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rosiestep (talk · contribs) 19:54, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this one over the weekend. --Rosiestep (talk) 19:54, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Except for a few commas, which I added myself, I couldn't find any suggested improvements. Good job. Looks adequate for GA. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

@Rosiestep: Many thanks for the review! 97198 (talk) 04:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)