 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
[Untitled] edit
I removed the original research tag. As this is a historical period, original research would not be possible unless someone made up stuff off the top of the their head. The problem here is lack of sources. However,many of the games and sports mentioned in the article are mentioned, if briefly, in the Elizabethan era article. The source tag should stand of course. Scarykitty 06:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
When someone gets bored, here are a few sites that might be useful as cites: [1] [2] The article needs a lot more work than my few edits and beginning reorg have accomplished. Sairen42 00:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Clean up edit
I've added numerous fact-tags and a general references tag. There seems to be a lot of "folk knowledge" about the Elizabethan era here which simply isn't true.
Do we think there can be sufficient information here to justify a separate article? If not, I'm going to recommend a merge with Elizabethan era. - PKM (talk) 21:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)