This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Of course this company is notable, unfortunately it is difficult to find proper references in English. Issues of socialism, issues of development status, issues of internet use and availability. Ironically, the company itself is working to correct these issues by being corporate, developing the country, and by creating an energy infrastructure. It's difficult to build ISPs and phone tower networks if the energy infrastructure isn't yet there. Which is why this company is so important. And notable. In the first place. ........At any rate, if the reader decides to tag the article, I will look into it, otherwise more references will be added in the future as they appear. Sincerely. --Mr Accountable (talk) 09:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
