 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:ElwatanFrontpage.jpg
edit
Image:ElwatanFrontpage.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
October 2023
edit@Madrahad1: 1) for s start, what the cheap propaganda outlet Morocco World News has to say about anything to do with Algeria belongs in a toilet. 2) reading this source, it's clear that you're cherry picking what to write and what to leave out. I haven't checked the rest (I will), but if this is anything to go by, then we have an issue. M.Bitton (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I believe that you deleted the entire section I had written on controversies around the newspaper. I did put time and effort into making sure what I cited was correct, and I believe that there are more polite ways of saying that you disagree. Rather than deleting the entire section, additional sources could have been added to ensure the material was correct. Madrahad1 (talk) 20:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)