Talk:Einstein's Dreams

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

I added the category 1990s science fiction novels. Transcendentalist01 (talk) 23:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Einstein's Dreams/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
I wouldn't presume to edit the actual article, because I have been assigned to read and comment on this book at my university, and have grown to hate it, but if there is someone out there who does edit this article, please take what I have to say into consideration.

This book is raft with logical impossibilities, and dull reoccurring ideas. Specifically, there is an idea of a divide of two types of people, the happy ones and the unhappy, and most of the stories end with a surprise twist of everyone being unhappy. There is also a tendency for the flow of time to change it's behavior to fit the whim of the author, without reason or warning. I don't mean from dream to dream, I mean from the start of a dream to it's ending. For example: In the chapter titled, "3 June 1905" the dream starts with the concept that a life time consists of a single day. The author explains this by saying that either the people have accelerated lives, or that the cosmic motions are slowed. In the end of the dream, we are told that "People heed time like cats straining to hear sounds in the attic." How can this be? If our whole lifetime takes a day, and if a day last our whole lifetime, why should time become more precious? Isn't this forgetting that the observer doesn't notice fluctuations in time? The author himself states just this in the chapter "June 20th 1905".

I just thought that it should be noted that although this novel is very poetic, it's not very well thought out, and there are contradictions everywhere. It might be appropriate to link to some sort of review of the novel.

Josiah4jc 19:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 19:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Einstein's Dreams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply