Talk:Ecojustice Canada
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ecojustice Canada article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The significance and importance of Ecojustice Canada is made very clear in this article. The article explains in great length what kind of work this organization does and the success it has had.
Ecojustice Canada is an extremely important non-profit organization in Canada because it provides legal services free of charge, in an effort to improve and protect our environment - this includes air, water, human health, global warming and wildlife, to name a few core issues. I can't understand how this does not come through in the proposed article.
This is a time in our history when reversing environmental damage is more important to people than ever before. This is a time when we need to educate and inform the public about organizations that are making this issue a priority, and achieving profound and meaningful results. Greenpeace and the David Suzuki Foundation, two groups with very similar missions, are entitled to publish Wikipedia pages. Ecojustice should be afforded the same opportunity.
Sophie81 20:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
The article at least asserts importance, so as the reviewing admin, I am not deleting it. But it can still be challenged at WP:AFD. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a way of getting PR, and does not judge on the basis of the worthiness of the mission, but the importance of the actual organisation, as shown by published third party references in reliable sources--the article needs some. And be aware that none of the text can be copied from a another web site. DGG (talk) 00:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Content from orphan wells (Alberta) article edit
I have used the same content in this article and in the article I created Orphan wells (Alberta) in the section on the Redwater case.Oceanflynn (talk) 03:00, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
Public Inquiry into Anti-Alberta Energy Campaigns edit
I have used the same content in this article, from the section Public Inquiry into Anti-Alberta Energy Campaigns in the article I created Public Inquiry into Anti-Alberta Energy Campaigns, which is a fork from the Premiership of Jason Kenney.Oceanflynn (talk) 19:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)