Talk:Eat It (album)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
critical reception of this record was almost universally bad . . . edit
There's no section on the critical response to "Eat It," an album generally savaged in the press - many rock historian see it as the beginning of the end for the band, being padded with soul numbers after the tight and hard-rock previous album "Smokin'". I read a lot of rock mags back then, and remember many bad reviews, and only a couple of journalists giving the record a lackluster write-up. Rolling Stone, Creem, New Music Express and Zig-Zag were particularly harsh in their reviews. Nor has the album fared well historically - The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Rock (edited by Nick Logan & Bob Woffinden of the NME) and Rolling Stone Record Guide don't hold it in high regard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.169.34.62 (talk) 10:43, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Australian chart ranking edit
This article says #9, but Humble_Pie#Studio_albums says #41. AMCKen (talk) 04:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)