Talk:Eastern Avenue station/GA1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Eviolite in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Eviolite (talk · contribs) 18:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be taking this one. eviolite (talk) 18:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments:
- Where is "Urban Ring Phase 2 FACT SHEET" from, and why is it an RS? I understand it is used only to cite a general description of the project, so not a big deal.
- Done It's from a Massachusetts state agency - I've added that to the citation.
- Could the connection to the MBTA bus and the adjoining stations (as shown in the infobox) be also mentioned and referenced in the station layout section?
- Link Everett, Massachusetts
- Done
- Link Right-of-way (transportation) to avoid confusion with the common legal definition
- Done
- Consider linking South Boston
- Done
- Link Bellingham Square (or maybe Bellingham Square station? unsure)
- Done
It was a nice read overall, well written, with few issues (mostly minor nitpicks with links) - putting on hold for now. Thanks, eviolite (talk) 23:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Eviolite: Thanks for the review! I believe I've addressed all your comments. (BTW, if you're interested in more GA reviews, I've nominated three other articles that share a lot of history with this one: Box District station, Bellingham Square station, and Chelsea station (MBTA). I've already made the same copyedits to those three. No pressure, of course!) Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! Happy to promote this to GA given those edits. (And I'll see if I can look at those other noms later, but right now I'm trying to review one nomination from each GA topic.) Great work. eviolite (talk) 03:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)