 | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Status re: Articles for deletion
editInterested parties should be aware of and refer to the discussion on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/EMedicine.
I personally feel that this page should be moved to eMedicine.com and that this page be retained as a disambiguation page; probably with introductory content to assist in directing users to more detailed content on related pages dealing with what is often called colloquially as e-Medicine, i-medicine, e-Health, etc. Also as others have noted, there are 19 other languages linked to this page, so care needs to be made (in case of a page relocation) to ensure that this other language links are adjusted if, and as, appropriate.
Enquire (talk) 05:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Template
editIn case you didn't know, there is a template here: Template:EMedicine
Enquire (talk) 06:49, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Clarification
editRe. "studies";
"12% of radiology residents" and "114 sites rated it the second-highest Internet-based source of information" - where were these people from? Who conducted this survey? At the moment, this is unclear and somewhat misleading. Chzz ► 11:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)