| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the EFF Prometheus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Proposed delation
editI have removed the deletion tag. Many aircraft covered in Wikipedia articles are one-offs for various reasons but may still be notable. Not all are as well known as (say) the Bell X-1 or Bristol Brabazon but if they were discussed and described in detail at the time or have since featured in summarising publications, they are notable in WikiP terms.TSRL (talk) 09:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that the type is notable. It was built, flew and gained enough attention to be written up in reliable sources, such as Janes, so it makes WP:GNG on that basis alone. Less famous than the X-1, but still in the same category, as an experimental type that spawned later developments by other builders. - Ahunt (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)