Talk:Duty drawback

Comments

YEAHHHHH —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.46.233 (talk) 02:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

This article contains several grammatical errors and typos that make it almost unreadable by a non-expert. In the lead sentence, "Drawback, in law in commerce, paying back a duty previously paid on exporting excisable articles or on re-exporting foreign goods.", the double prepositional phrase "... in law in commerce" is awkward. How about just "...in commerce law"? And "paying back a duty previously paid" doesn't make sense: who is 'paying back' whom? The same party? Or a government entity 'paying back' a business entity? And "... re-exporting foreign goods" is ambiguous. Even worse, in the next paragraph, the wording "... used in the manufacturing of goods in and is exported" is broken and unfixable without knowledge of the subject. DrJeff (talk) 18:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

This article has been updated to reflect the current law under TFTEA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.136.203.241 (talk) 01:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 16 June 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. A natural disambiguation. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

---

Drawback → Duty Drawback – 'Drawback' is too ambiguous; the correct terminology in the industry is 'Duty Drawback' Lauren1453 (talk) 02:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Polyamorph (talk) 06:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Content below was copied from WP:RM/TR. Polyamorph (talk) 06:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

• • Objection: Since this RM concerns the primary topic of the term "Drawback" (currently, it is the duty drawback sense), it would benefit from a more thorough discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) 06:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
• Support see Drawback (disambiguation) In ictu oculi (talk) 21:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Speaking of which how is disadvantage not a dab page? In ictu oculi (talk) 21:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Probably because Disadvantage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) isn't about wikt:en:disadvantage, similar to the situation with drawback -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 02:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

It's also clearly not primary topic by any stretch of the imagination. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.