This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronationsWikipedia:WikiProject MicronationsTemplate:WikiProject MicronationsMicronations articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
From the Reception section:
The project was a failure. It was rejected because the country was not ready for democracy and if the city was actually built, the constitution would be used only in the city but not nationwide.
This suggests that the city was never actually built. However, the Creation section appears to contradict this by talking about the city like it actually existed and people actually participated. It might be a good idea to make it clear which of these is the case in the first paragraph. 2405:9800:B620:6BD:0:0:0:8FA (talk) 17:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I have rephrased these two statements to distinguish experiment and expectation of follow-on. Aithus (talk) 09:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
