Talk:Dual-ported RAM
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Unknown subject
editI doubt that dual ported VRAM is commonly used any longer. Nowadays the bandwidth required to read out the frame buffer is miniscule compared to the bandwidth required to render 3D scenes on it, so there is no real benefit from a special port that is used for framebuffer readout. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.236.55.37 (talk) 12:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
I have seen dual port RAM (though not VRAM) in the wild. In the particular usage I saw, it was done as a conscious simplification of FPGA development, designed to ensure FPGA developers did not need to be aware of bus contention between the FPGA and the test chips that support it. I may venture a guess that, once the product comes off of the test board and into production, the DPRAM would be replaced with single port RAM, without altering the FPGA in any way. CmdrRickHunter (talk) 22:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Look out for possible copyright violations in this article
editThis article has been found to be edited by students of the Wikipedia:India Education Program project as part of their (still ongoing) course-work. Unfortunately, many of the edits in this program so far have been identified as plain copy-jobs from books and online resources and therefore had to be reverted. See the India Education Program talk page for details. In order to maintain the WP standards and policies, let's all have a careful eye on this and other related articles to ensure that no copyrighted material remains in here. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
India Education Program course assignment
editThis article was the subject of an educational assignment at Department of Electronics and Telecommunication, College of Engineering, Pune, India supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)