Talk:Doe v. Bush

Ruling

This article cannot claim that this ruling established the legality since there was no ruling. When a case is dismissed the courts offer no opinion on the merits of the case.Nomen Nescio^{Gnothi seauton} 11:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Actually, the court ruled that the case has no merits. I changed "legality" to "constitutionality" so it can't be confused with international law. Isaac Pankonin 23:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

As an aside, I don't see how you can call your edits "tweak" when you completely reverted my edits. Why not just press the undo button? Isaac Pankonin 23:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doe v. Bush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070911191508/http://www.mfso.org/article.php?id=334 to http://www.mfso.org/article.php?id=334
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070809115028/http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/03-1266-01A.pdf to http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/03-1266-01A.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)