Talk:Documentation generator

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I read an excellent article disparaging documentation generators not so long ago. However, I can no longer find it. It discussed how they fail to provide a proper high-level view of the code, discourage the writing of real documentation, and are easily surpassed as API documentation by a clear source (which includes the comments and docstrings anyway). Does anyone know the article I'm talking about? This is for personal interest, but such a viewpoint is probably also important for the article. --88.111.240.31 23:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic