This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article was copy edited by Stfg, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 13 July 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This extract appears in the "Current legal practice" section, paragraph 2: "the Metro Hotel refused the non-uniformed soldier when he presented his army warrant card". When I was serving, I did not possess a "warrant" card, (that was left to the police). I know the reference refers to a "warrant" card but an identity card or ID card (MOD Form 90) is what soldiers are still issued with. So, is "warrant" card the right choice of phrase?