Talk:Dicynodontia

should probably merge this and dicynodon page. not being particularly successful in figuring out how. 129.67.119.242 (talk) 10:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dicynodont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060222040556/http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/400Therapsida/400.725.html to http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/400Therapsida/400.725.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Pristerodon

According to the cladogram, Pristerodon does *not* belong to the Pristerodontia, a matter that seems very starnge, especially as this strange thing it is not mentioned in the text.

This is also in contrast to the cladogram given in fi:Pristerodon, and it remains unclear is family Pistrodontidae has to be placed at Pristerodon's location or below Pristerodontia.

Pleas, could anyone clarify? Kind regards, --Ernsts (talk) 19:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

New (?) large Triassic dicynodont Lisowicia bojani

New (?) large Triassic dicynodont Lisowicia bojani

Lisowicia was about 4.5 metres (14.7ft) long and 2.6 metres (8.5ft) high ... 40% larger than any dicynodont identified before.

https://metro.co.uk/2018/11/22/an-elephant-sized-mammal-walked-among-the-dinosaurs-claim-scientists-8166651/

This is obviously from a very "popular press" (silly) article, but if we can find any better sources we should start an article Lisowicia.

- 189.122.238.134 (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

[Edit] Likely this - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dicynodont_from_PolandDB.jpg - "unnamed" as of 2008. - 189.122.238.134 (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

More - found some articles in the reputable journal Science -

An elephant-sized Late Triassic synapsid with erect limbs

Tomasz Sulej1, Grzegorz Niedźwiedzki2,*

Science 22 Nov 2018: eaal4853 DOI: 10.1126/science.aal4853

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2018/11/19/science.aal4853

Giant mammal cousin rivaled early dinosaurs

Gretchen Vogel

Science 23 Nov 2018: Vol. 362, Issue 6417, pp. 879 DOI: 10.1126/science.362.6417.879

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/362/6417/879

- 189.122.238.134 (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

To add to article

To add to this article: what do we think the tusks were used for? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)