Talk:Diana Award

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diana Memorial Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160310122246/http://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/media/press-releases/prince-william-and-prince-harry-host-concert-party-children to https://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/media/press-releases/prince-william-and-prince-harry-host-concert-party-children

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Rewrite based on reliable sources

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I've tagged the article for reliance on primary sources and generally sounding like a press release. It should really be rewritten based on reliable, third-party sources, with a focus on sources about the subject itself. If many of them exist, that is. Virtually all of the third-party sources in the article are puff pieces about local winners of the prize and the whole thing comes across as a vanity press/Who's Who scam. Whether that's true or not, I have no idea. Woodroar (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Done. Trimmed article to claims cited to reliable, third-party published sources. Woodroar (talk) 03:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic