Talk:Detroit Department of Transportation

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Criticalthinker in topic DDOT Reimagined

Woodward Avenue Light Rail

edit

There needs to be made some mention somewhere on the page of Woodward Avenue Light Rail, which DDOT would manage and operate upon its completion. --Criticalthinker (talk) 02:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Many of the recently uploaded images her are blatent copyright violations. File:ThumbnailCA8LZY73.jpg and File:ThumbnailCAZ1GN0Z.jpg are sourced from http://www.transithub.net/ddot.htm and others come from http://www.cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=Detroit_Department_of_Transportation. Nobody uploads thumbnails. Please check them all. 70.48.65.140 (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Facilities

edit

As I do more research and get more information, I'll be adding a section to the article called "Facilities" which will detail the major depots (Coolidge and Shoemaker) and transfer stations/interchanges (Rose Parks, Northland, Eastland, Fairlane and Fair Grounds). However, if someone is able to get this information before I do, please add it, and I'll see what I can do to help or add. DDOT may have lost a lot of its infrastructure, but it's still a major transit agency, and the page needs to reflect that and not just its history. --Criticalthinker (talk) 00:20, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wanted downtown Detroit 1978-2003 streetcar photos

edit

c:Category:Detroit Citizens’ Railway: This category has an rather complete tree of subcategories (covered all but two fleet items) all pretty much categorized — it is only lacking photographs (or other media items). I tried to populate it using stuff already in Commons and in other free media repositories, to no avail. Any suggestions…? -- Tuválkin 23:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Detroit Department of Transportation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Former routes

edit

This section is inconsistent with how most transit pages are done. Given that routes are modified fairly regularly, if this is to be kept, it should be in a closed drop-down menu. The current routes also take up much of the page inconsistent with how transit pages are done. --Criticalthinker (talk) 11:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

I agree. This section is trivia and should be deleted. 96.27.35.110 (talk) 06:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Daily ridership

edit

Where did the figures go for "daily ridership", which consistent with other wiki tranist pages is a very important - and probably most important - measure of ridership to be included in the infobox? I see annual ridership now appears to be automated? I experimented with template, but couldn't figure it out. Anyway, we have daily (weekday) ridership for Q3 2022 reported to the APTA as is typical: https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/2022-Q3-Ridership-APTA.pdf Criticalthinker (talk) 07:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

DDOT Reimagined

edit

As was more concern, before, people are adding information that is making sections too long, particularly given that this is a proposal and not just that but the draft of a proposal, not even necessarily the final one. This is not consistent with wiki articles; we don't do full punch-for-punch rundowns like this. Clean this article up. We don't need to list ALL the proposed route changes; we need a general description of some of the more significant changes (BRT routes, for instance) and that's it. People can click through the citation for greater detail. Criticalthinker (talk) 22:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply