Talk:Destroy Dick December
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Twistedaxe in topic Contested deletion
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • No Nut November Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:No Nut November |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 18 November 2022. The result of the discussion was keep as long as it's mentioned. |
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance. Reason mainly is mostly because the article No Nut November exists, and this is a parody of it. Why should it be deleted? I could not provide reliable sources because it was hard to do so, but some sources that apparently Wikipedia deem unreliable (Know Your Meme, Urban Dictionary and more google searches) back up my claim. /Twistedaxe
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Destroy%20Dick%20December
https://www.dictionary.com/e/pop-culture/destroy-dick-december/
https://metro.co.uk/2018/12/01/what-is-destroy-your-dick-december-8198082/
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/destroy-dick-december
https://www.reddit.com/r/destroydickdecember/
- Hello Twistedaxe -- Thanks for providing some sources. I've declined the deletion request in light of this. A quick news search, however, does not show wide coverage in the kind of sources that Wikipedia generally considers reputable, and it could therefore be vulnerable to deletion via a deletion discussion. I'd suggest merging into No Nut November for now until reliable sources are available. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hey Espresso, I appreciate your reply. My point behind listing the sources was that, although they might not be found reputable by Wikipedia, the main point here is that they all state mostly the same thing - and, of course, although it doesn't render the article completely immune to deletion, it still says something more than just simply not being reputable. And the merge idea is great I think, it could possibly be a thing other editors could bring later on. Twistedaxe (talk) 14:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)