Talk:Department of Science and Technology (India)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Shraddhajadhav in topic request for merge

request for merge edit

this page should be merged with Ministry of Science and Technology (India)--Neelkamala (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

It should be independent and even enriched in a better aspect. Must have to include a head of fundings. Rahulsomantalk - contribs 15:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes, It should be independent and developed. I have started the development work. It is big and old department having the annual budget of (US$850 million) and celebrating 50th anniversary this year. - Shraddhajadhav (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Department of Science and Technology (India). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply