 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.demos.org/page2.cfm. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2006100310001098. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Opening heading edit
While this article isn't comprehensive, it's certainly a good start for an organization that DOES exist and that lots of people might come to Wikipedia for more information about. Strong Keep. 160.39.40.145 15:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Partisan Think Tank edit
This is a partisan, or at least a progressive think tank. (Observe its agenda, board and leadership.) If we decide to use the "non-partisan" label, then we should add progressive or liberal to describe its agenda for accuracy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.18.73.91 (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, this is clearly a progressive outfit...just look at the leadership (Van Jones...yeah, non-partisan). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.73.17.241 (talk) 02:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Move? edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move, and as per Jenks24, guidance in WP:MOS#US applies to content, not titles. U.S. is used consistently throughout the article. Taking it out of the title serves no useful purpose. Mike Cline (talk) 14:52, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Demos (U.S. think tank) → Demos (US think tank) –
- for consistency with Demos (UK think tank) & WP:MOS#US – 2.26.167.200 (talk) 02:11, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- I do not think that WP:MOS#US applies here (it concerns consistency within an article, not consistency between two articles). Jenks24 (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
“Liberal” edit
Readers need to keep in mind that “liberal” is now a euphemism for communist. 24.168.112.238 (talk) 01:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC)