Talk:Deeplearning4j

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Deeplearning4j. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160310082156/http://www.skymind.io/commerce/ to http://www.skymind.io/commerce/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924061240/http://www.oraclejavamagazine-digital.com/javamagazine/may_june_2015?sub_id=DJ9kzXBnuXELe to http://www.oraclejavamagazine-digital.com/javamagazine/may_june_2015?sub_id=DJ9kzXBnuXELe

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

'Archive URL' needed ("404 -- Not found") ... but it may not exist

Footnote number "19" of the current version (the specific version that was then current, when these comments were written) of the ["Deeplearning4j"] article ... points to (the bare URL) https://skymind.ai/bsa-aml [1].

That link [1] seems to be a {{dead link}}.

I even checked both of the "archived" copies (on web.archive.org) of that web page (Feb. 02, 2017: http://web.archive.org/web/20170202022908/https://skymind.ai/bsa-aml and July 28, 2017: http://web.archive.org/web/20170728043412/https://skymind.ai/bsa-aml) ... but those are of no help. They were snapshotted "too late". (They both say "404 -- File not found".)

If someone had somehow (had a crystal ball, ... or had a robot on Wikipedia to always automatically do this... and) *** created *** a backup copy -- [e.g.] either on the Webcite web site or on the Wayback machine [web.archive.org] web site, [as soon as the link in the footnote was "edited in" to the article ... in "article space"] ... then maybe the original version of [1] "could have been" snapshotted when it still looked the way it looked on the (unknown) "access date". (The "access date" is unknown because the whole "ref" tag contains [only] a bare URL; it does not even have [e.g.] an instance of a {{cite web}} template ... nor any other template.)

It is possible that the company Skymind -- or whoever runs / maintains the web site skymind.ai -- might have some "archived" copies available somewhere ... that could be used somehow to set up a working "archiveurl" field for that footnote ["ref" tag]; ... (probably inside an instance of a {{cite web}} template, or something like that).

However, I do not know how to find it. (It might not be online; it might be on e.g. some backup tapes ... and if so, then those might actually be "off site", too) (...in addition to being "off line").

Maybe someone who has a "friend of a friend", who has connections with someone at [the company] Skymind ... could put in a request for some cooperation.

OR, ... maybe someone who is familiar with other "archival" web sites -- (other than Webcite and the Wayback machine) -- could find a backup copy, someplace on the web.

Any comments? --Mike Schwartz (talk) 21:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

There are a whole lot of 404s now since the documentation site was updated. I think we should remove all the non-working links and references. WmEddie (talk) 09:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Categorization

I don't understand why this is in Category:JVM programming languages. It's an API and not a language. 178.24.245.120 (talk) 11:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)