Talk:Deep in Love/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 07:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

I'll get to this before Sunday if you have responded to my comments on the talk page before then. Those are the major issues that I can't really start reviewing the article without them being addressed; there are other issues too that I will point out. --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead

• 2011 should be listed as the recorded year in the infobox as the background and release section clearly sources it as such "composed the song in 2011"
• "It was later released as a CD single in Italy on 31 October 2011 by Step and Go, while also made available" → "It was released as a CD single in Italy on 31 October 2011 through Step and Go, while later made available"
• Change target of Radio ZU to Intact Media Group

Background and release

• "Italy on 31 October 2011 by Step and Go" → "Italy on 31 October 2011 via Step and Go"

Music video and promotion

• Good, apart from the same target issue with Radio ZU as the lead

Commercial performance

• "The aforementioned broadcast monitoring service also conducted a year-end chart for 2012, where the track was ranked at number 29." → "Media Forest conducted a year-end radio airplay chart for 2012, where the track ranked at number 29."

Credits and personnel

• Good

Track listings

• Good

Charts

• Good

Certifications

• Good

Release history

• Good

References

• Refs 7, 8 and 9 should have Amazon (company) as the target
• Set Federazione Industria Musicale Italiana as the target for ref 17
• Ref 21 should target Polish Society of the Phonographic Industry

Final comments and verdict

• Looks much better this time around, just a few minor issues that need fixing and I'll pass this as a GA. --Kyle Peake (talk) 15:55, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

@Kyle Peake: Everything has been addressed. Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

@Cartoon network freak: Love it! I'll gladly ✓ Pass this. --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

@Kyle Peake: Hi and thank you very much for passing! Is there any possibility you can also get to "On a Sunday", the last one I'm demanding. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Cartoon network freak Will do, do you think you could review "Low Lights" for me actually? --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)