Talk:Dcraw

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Brooksrichardbrown in topic Is dcraw at end of life?
edit

Why does the link to the manpage go to a mirror site? Why not just link to: http://cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/dcraw.1.html ? Josh Thompson 16:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good question, so I changed the link to your suggestion. --Berland 18:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

dcraw for Delphi

edit

Added dcraw for Delphi by Davie Lee Reed to External Links 82.39.157.137 (talk) 19:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Initial release date

edit

I can't find an initial release announcement. The current date up there was found by pulling the dcraw.c,v file on the dcraw homepage, running parsecvs on it to turn it into something I could browse more pleasantly, and flipping through the diffs in gitview until I found where he upped the version string to 1.00. I might as well have picked revision 1.3, on 1997-02-24, marked "Final 1.0 version". At this point, however, it was called "Canon PowerShot Converter". The earliest announcement relating to "dcraw" as such was a 2003 article. I'm not entirely pleased with the date that's on there--there's no evidence that it was actually released at that point--but it's better than nothing, and it has some grounding in fact. grendel|khan 21:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Used by Photoshop?

edit

Well, that's what it says here: http://www.rawtherapee.com/?mitem=4&faqid=17. Comments? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.27.150 (talk) 13:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

These front-ends are not front-ends

edit

The programs listed here as front-ends are not necessarily front-ends. Some are much more than a front-end, others aren't even front-ends at all, such as RawTherpaee which uses dcraw only for reading the raw file - all other modifications do not use dcraw. While RT should be listed in this article as it uses dcraw, it should not be under a "Front-end" heading, and this goes for other programs listed here as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrSlony (talkcontribs) 03:31, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dcraw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Capitalization

edit

Dave Coffin named the tool "dcraw," not "DCRAW;" the article should use the former. In addition, the word "raw" is not an initialism or acronym. The decision made for the Raw image format page to use "raw" should be applied here, as well, except when directly quoting phrases or names. Lovibond (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is dcraw at end of life?

edit

Dcraw hasn't been updated for a couple years now. As an example, it doesn't support Canon's flagship D5 Mark IV. Seems like libraw.org has now taken on the open source camera raw support torch. Should the article contain something about this? Brooksrichardbrown (talk) 20:53, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply