Talk:Data imaginaries

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peer Review edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi @WiznerdTheEagle, your article was great! I loved the clear structure and links to other articles. I have completed my peer review in the peer review sandbox with some edits / suggestions. I'd be more than happy to help clarify anything, so just let me know if you have any questions :) ~~~~ Lokio2021 (talk) 14:35, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Lokio2021, thanks for the fantastic feedback! I just finished going through everything. As I went I responded to your feedback in your peer review sandbox (partly to respond, partly to just make sure I dealt with everything). Everything you said was really useful and I think I have implemented it all, though of course I am always open to further feedback (if your schedule allows) WiznerdTheEagle (talk) 04:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @WiznerdTheEagle, my pleasure! I also posted little comments on the peer review after I read over the revisions. I love the example you added for Data Activists. I think those minor changes helped with the flow and clarity of your article but overall, it was awesome! You did a great job :) Lokio2021 (talk) 14:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi @WiznerdTheEagle, I've added my peer review for your article. There are very few changes to suggest, your article seems to be pretty much ready for publishing. Let me know if you have any questions regarding my feedback. Kaitlinabeele (talk) 20:27, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review @Kaitlinabeele! I responded to your feedback on your peer review page. You caught some things that I can't believe that I missed. I really appreciate it :) WiznerdTheEagle (talk) 16:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: COMS4407 Critical Data Studies in Communication edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 September 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): WiznerdTheEagle (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Kaitlinabeele.

— Assignment last updated by Grilledtandoorismoke (talk) 18:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Also peer reviewed by @Lokio2021. WiznerdTheEagle (talk) 18:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic