Talk:Data element name

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Manolan1 in topic Where does ISO 11179 discuss collections?

I am proposing that only the sections in ISO/IEC 11179 that are related to naming be merged into this article. A possible exception might be the text relating to database table names, which might move to Relational database instead.
RayGates 23:22, 22 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I did the merge. Thanks Ray! - Feb 1 2006 Dan

Thank *you*, Dan! RayGates 02:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Time warp? edit

What does ISO 11179 have to do with data element names? Data element (aka column name, attribute, tuple? & others) was what we called data back in the days of punch cards & ISAM files. 11179, while a nice idea, is a very late comer to the game & has had minimal impact to date. DEddy (talk) 15:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Where does ISO 11179 discuss collections? edit

The article says "Tables are Collections of Entities, and follow Collection naming guidelines", seemingly paraphrasing some part of ISO 11179. However, I am not sure where this is described in any part of the document. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.186.244.238 (talk) 20:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree: ISO 11179 says nothing about this at all. I believe this connection comes from Joe Celko's SQL Programming Style (ISBN 978-0120887972) section 1.2.1. The problem with that section in the book and, by extension, this comment in the article, is that it feels like someone is looking for a standards-based justification for their own personal preference. Manolan1 (talk) 13:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply