Talk:Darkstalkers: The Night Warriors

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Darkstalkers: The Night Warriors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430182123/http://www.eidolons-inn.net:80/segabase/32X-Darkstalkers.html to http://www.eidolons-inn.net/segabase/32X-Darkstalkers.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524042405/http://www.craveonline.com/gaming/article/top-ten-2-d-fighters-of-all-time-65021 to http://www.craveonline.com/gaming/article/top-ten-2-d-fighters-of-all-time-65021

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

32X version

So once again I've removed the claim of a 32X version of this game. There are two problems with the latest sourcing of this claim. First, as per WP:VG/RS, Sega-16 is another unreliable source apart from articles by Ken Horowitz and developer interviews. Second, I'm troubled that the only concrete info Sega-16 has on the 32X version is that it was announced at the 1994 Summer CES, because that CES announcement with no demo (not even an non-playable one) is the only concrete info I've seen on the 32X version anywhere. At best, that suggests that no major progress was made on the 32X port. Scrutinized with a healthy dose of skepticism, it hints that Capcom may have made the announcement for publicity's sake with no serious intention of actually porting the game to 32X, or even as a result of a miscommunication (e.g. someone was told they were working on a PlayStation version of Darkstalkers and said 32X version instead).

A 32X version seems plausible, and it's a matter of record that Capcom were a licensed 32X developer, but solid sourcing that a 32X version actually existed is still missing.--Martin IIIa (talk) 01:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

@Martin IIIa:I found this pretty recently regarding the fabled 32X version: https://retrocdn.net/index.php?title=File%3AEGM2_US_05.pdf&page=22 Roberth Martinez (talk) 15:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Man, you are the king of research. That looks all good to me, so I won't object if you add that to the article (or I can add it myself if you prefer). Martin IIIa (talk) 16:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)