Talk:Dark-sky preserve

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 151.192.80.101 in topic Tone that sounds like opinion

Aoraki MacKenzie night sky reserve size edit

Aoraki MacKenzie night sky reserve size is not 4300 km in radius, but 4300 square kilometers. [1] page 9 shows the map of the area. Since it might be that all the other reserve sizes are measured in radius of the area, I didn't edit the chart, but right now the information is wrong. The radius is more like 40km than 4300 km.

109.240.48.160 (talk) 20:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC) dmlReply

References

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dark-sky preserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dark-sky preserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

DailyMail: "Idaho plans to open the first Dark Sky Reserve in the U.S." edit

This is something for regular contributors to this Wiki article to watch: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4888326/Stargazers-eye-nations-dark-sky-reserve-Idaho.html

It says they plan to apply this fall and expect the approval process to take about 10 weeks after the application is submitted. Phantom in ca (talk) 06:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

This has since happened and been added to the article. -- Beland (talk) 07:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Dark-sky preserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Tone that sounds like opinion edit

This section in the intro does not sound authoritative. It sounds rhetorical, like the writer is making an argument to convince the reader of something:

“A dark night sky is associated with so many facets of history, philosophy, religion, societal development, poetry, song, mathematics, and science.[2] Hence, the preservation of a DSP is necessary to understand our environmental history.”

The second claim does not have a source either. Can we find one to support this? 151.192.80.101 (talk) 03:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply