This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work, thank you. However the article seems to be missing or emphasizing that this organization tends to be seen as right-wing/emphasizing specifically freedom to criticize Islam, which all of the sources mention.
I don't understand this comment, as I have stated four times directly in the article something about its "criticism of Islam", Hedegaard's controversial "writings on Islam", reprinting of "Muhammad cartoons", and two prominent members leaving the group due to Hedegaard's "comments on Muslims". Thismess (talk) 22:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The statement that the Society is "non-partisan" in the led appears not to be supported by the source cited. It seems (via Google Translate) to be instead making a much narrower claim: that the Society describes itself as "a cross-political association". We should not be asserting self-description as objective fact. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
