 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Retaining Red Links
editI undid the removal of red links, per WP:RED: "In general, red links should not be removed if they link to something that could plausibly sustain an article."
If there are specific instances where it is felt that certain a red-linked individual will never meet WP:NOTE, obviously that's different, but (at least to me) it seems plausible to me that all of the currently listed individuals could be considered notable under WP guidelines. Rnickel (talk) 18:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Red links may be relevant for regular articles. For disambiguation pages, it makes no sense to have red links that aren't already being referenced by other articles. Please see WP:MOSDAB. --Tesscass (talk) 23:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well. I learned something today. :-) Rnickel (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)