Talk:Da Funk

Verify source

I had to remove this statement:

The track bears a heavy influence of G-Funk and said to be made after Bangalter & Homem-Christo had listened to west coast rap and g-funk for weeks time

The source in question is not English and seems to be self-published which violates WP:RELIABLE. A ISBN search doesn't provide further information about the statement made and I would love if information could be provided with a transcribe to English so I could allow the source to be added back in. ♫ Douglasr007 (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

References

30,000 copies in 1997. NONSENSE

THE single was a world hit It even reached the top 10 of the UK Charts. IT charted in germany after the success of AROUND THE WORLD and made it to # 65

and many more

it missed the US HOT 100 charts narrowly- It had healthy sales in the USA. But the HOT 100 CHARTS are based on Sales and Airplay. therefore AIRPLAY of the song was nearly zero

it reached #30 on the SINGLE SALES

therefore the INFORMATION 30,000 copies sold in 1997 is not reliable

Where it sold that sum ?

in the USA ?

IN THE UK

in france ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.15.237.46 (talk) 17:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Da Funk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140710090208/http://dancemusic.about.com/cs/interviews/a/IntDaftPunkDave_3.htm to http://dancemusic.about.com/cs/interviews/a/IntDaftPunkDave_3.htm
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120629032508/http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Artists/D/Daft_Punk/1997/04/12/744419.html to http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Artists/D/Daft_Punk/1997/04/12/744419.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Year of release

I'm not comprehending the removal of sourced comments about the single's release.

Da Funk was initially released by Soma Records in 1995. The duo signed with Virgin in 1996. The single was released again - look at the EP which has both Soma and Virgin logos on it - in 1996. These statements are sourced. You don't go by the "most cited" date especially with record labels because it could be anything noted as exceptions in the notability guidelines for music-related articles. You're going to get the 1997 date from any streaming site or seller because they are obtaining that from the respective label.

Regardless of the most cited, this history is important to note because it's when the duo got signed to a major label. The transition from the different labels and also maintaining exclusive rights to the music is essential to note. The timeline needs to be there. It's more critical in the Homework article also. – The Grid (talk) 00:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

1995 is the first date and should be listed first. The next, most famous release, comes second. Binksternet (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)