Talk:Cyborg (novel)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic Fair use rationale for Image:CyborgNovel.jpg

Fair use rationale for Image:CyborgNovel.jpg edit

 

Image:CyborgNovel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Cyborg (novel)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Remained assessed as a "Start" class article as there is little here to establish notability and certainly nothing like sections on ==Major themes== or ==Literary significance & criticism==. Otherwise a fairly well written article, it still has need of Referencing and in-line citations with a Footnotes section. Otherwise it may well be concidered Original Research. Good but more work needed. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 09:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)