Talk:Customer feedback management services
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
source licences
editShouldn't the table have a source code licence column? Kiwibird (talk) 08:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Customer feedback management services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120214045951/http://aberdeen.com/aberdeen-library/7460/RA-customer-experience-satisfaction.aspx to http://www.aberdeen.com/Aberdeen-Library/7460/RA-customer-experience-satisfaction.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303221215/http://reviewforumoptimization.com/ to http://reviewforumoptimization.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
This article needs cleanup
editThis article needs more and better sources; some of the cited sources don't clearly verify the statements they are supposed to support. Also, the table formatting is broken, and there should be some inclusion criteria established for services that are listed in the table, per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Any assistance in solving these problems would be greatly appreciated. Biogeographist (talk) 16:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)