Talk:Currencies of Puerto Rico/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
To start, the lead needs to be broken up into multiple paragraphs. The entire article has many long paragraphs that can simply be split up. I didn't have time to review it all now, but what I read looks very good and well-referenced. Reywas92^Talk 21:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply, I'm on it. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I believe the first issues have been attended. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I have performed a small copyedit. Nothing except they odd typo, but there were a number capitalization errors.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Thorough, exiting and well written article. No problems meeting the good article criteria. Congratulations!

Thanks for your review, sorry for the delayed response. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)