 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Perfect cubes edit
I am very confused about the list of perfect cubes. 4 is defintiely not a perfect cube and 122.300 WTF? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Autkm (talk • contribs) 02:09, 23 September 2006 Autkm (UTC)
- FTR, this looks like vandalism from User:194.82.224.20, which Autkm fixed in the next edit. -- Beland (talk) 03:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
n vs. x edit
I disagree with using n as the number. Most people think of n as an integer. However, cubes can be performed on any real number. I think x would be a better choice.PGScooter (talk) 06:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- As things stand now, "x" is used in the section "In real numbers, other fields, and rings", and "n" is used for the majority of the article, which given the geometrical diagrams and the implication of that section title, does seem to only be discussing integers. -- Beland (talk) 03:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Formulas edit
I have 2 formulas for representing any positive integer to 3rd degree(same kind progression which you already have in article), could you add this formulas? If you interested i will show you the references. --KolosovP (talk) 21:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Edit of a hatnote edit
@IAmChaos: Greetings! I'm not seeing an error in the revision with my recent change; am I missing something? Beland (talk) 06:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Beland! Your replacement of the 3 with <sup> tags caused the page to fall into the error category Category:Missing redirects, which I patrol sometimes. Sorry, I could've been more clear in my original edit summary. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 04:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Also, I noticed your other change and I just reinstated that. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 04:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @IAmChaos: Thanks for the clarification! I just tagged that as {{not a typo}} so no one will attempt to "fix" that again. -- Beland (talk) 03:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also, I noticed your other change and I just reinstated that. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 04:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)