Talk:Crystalline cohomology

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 71.212.185.82 in topic Examples

Should the section on algebraic de Rham cohomology rather be moved to de Rham cohomology? Jakob.scholbach 04:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Definitely not! There is already a notice on the top of de Rham cohomology article linking here. However, this page begins to overtake the article on motivic cohomology in its treatment of various Weil cohomology theories. Arcfrk 20:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
OK, I see the link in the de Rham page, but I still think, that the mathematical content if the section on algebraic de Rham coho. given here does (at least at the moment) not overlap with the crystalline part (except perhaps the idea, that both of them are Weil cohom. theories). Instead, the analogy of algebraic de Rham and classical de Rham cohomology is clear from the definition and they also give the same results (over C). So, why not put it there - in a subsection called "Algebraic de Rham cohomology"? Jakob.scholbach 23:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Examples edit

This page should discuss some of the examples in http://www.math.nyu.edu/~tschinke/books/finite-fields/final/09_wedhorn.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.185.82 (talk) 23:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crystalline cohomology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Improvements + References edit