Talk:Council of Scientific and Industrial Research

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Zezen in topic English please

Bias in Article

edit

This article includes many positive facts about CSIR, but many of the details lack proper references. In recent years, CSIR has been involved in much of the scandals around corruption in India and why despite high levels of funding there are not many patents or profitable inventions coming out of CSIR and its labs. Why is this? Petemclaren (talk) 11:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Reasons for deleting section on "How to get into CSIR Research Institutes"

edit

These were my reasons:

  • No explaination of what was wanted: online access or physical visitor access or how to get employed by CSIR or what?
  • Very poorly expressed comments such as "u can get de telephone numbers from the official web site n write to the director" and "student visits should be attested by de head of department" have no place in any Wikipedia article. Such comments should be made on the Discussion page and should use good English.

- mbeychok 20:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

English please

edit

I made some fixes here. Please rewrite it in English, e.g.

Budget

3098 Crore as of 2013 [1]

Zezen (talk) 08:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC)Reply