Talk:Cotton tensor

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cotton tensor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071010003140/http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/fitem?id=AFST_1899_2_1_4_385_0 to http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/fitem?id=AFST_1899_2_1_4_385_0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Making the definition readable by non-experts

I have read part of Berger Gauduchon Mazet long time ago and remember a few things about connections and the curvature tensor, and conventions in this field, but not all. The expression given for the coefficients of the Cotton tensor appears ambiguous to me.

• Does $\nabla _{j}$ refer to the connection (covariant derivative) associated to g (and w.r.t. the vector field $X=\partial _{j}=\partial /\partial x^{j}$) or is it just the partial derivative w.r.t. j?
• Does $\nabla _{j}\mathrm {Ric} _{ij}$ mean $(\nabla _{j}\mathrm {Ric} )_{ij}$ or $\nabla _{j}(\mathrm {Ric} _{ij})$? This is related to the previous question.
• Similarly the absence of parentheses in $\nabla _{j}Rg_{ik}$ makes it ambiguous, and as a non-expert, I cannot guess which parenthesing (bracketing) was meant: $(\nabla _{j}(Rg))_{ik}$, $\nabla _{j}(Rg_{ik})$, $(\nabla _{j}R)g_{ik}$, maybe another one I would have missed?

Arnaud Chéritat (talk) 10:04, 24 June 2021 (UTC)