This redirect is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
The contents of the Corridor G page were merged into U.S. Route 119 on 17 June 2017 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
If the original poster of the comment about Corridor G being upgraded to Interstate standards cannot post the quote from the Logan Banner here, I'd be inclined to think that this statement should be stripped from the article. This runs counter to all WVDOH's announced plans for constructing King Coal/Tolsia Highways and logically would be extremely difficult to do with the current alignment. Problems with having enough room are what led to the crossings into Kentucky.
In my mind, the original version of the comment mentioning Matewan rather than Williamson seems to reinforce that the poster confused Corridor G with the Delbarton Connector.Brian Powell (talk) 17:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
