Talk:Corporation Service Company

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Dagelf in topic General

Fair use rationale for Image:Csc logo2.jpg edit

 

Image:Csc logo2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

General edit

"According to CSC's website, CSC is the leader ..." is nonsensical and promotional. The company's opinion of itself is simple marketing.

There is also no definition of "Big Four" in the resident agent industry. Again, it is self-defined and is used for marketing purposes.


Simple, change "the" to and. Problem solved Dagelf (talk) 12:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Corporate affairs edit

The golden spike is not a rumor. I have one. It is engraved with "DRIVING THE GOLDEN SPIKE" on one side, and "Corporation Service Company (R)" on the other. It is non-ferromagnetic base metal, with a lustrous golden electroplating. I wasn't told to stake any hearts with it, though. I wasn't told anything about it at all, really. It would perhaps be more useful as a close-quarters weapon, to defend one's tiny cubicle space against encroachment by neighboring employees. I'll leave it to a non-employee to edit the article itself--conflict of interest, etc. etc. 71.87.21.195 (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is not "Well-Known" edit

That CSC is the second largest registered agent service in the world. If it were "well-known" then a citation could be easily obtained. If you ask 100,000 people at random what the second largest registered agent company in the world is, probably somewhere between zero and one would answer "CSC". This, IMHO, does not meet the threshold of "well-known". CoolDiscoDan (talk) 01:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply